![visual studio 2005 professional edition visual studio 2005 professional edition](https://sm.pcmag.com/t/pcmag_ap/photo/m/microsoft-/microsoft-visual-studio-2005_7z4m.1080.jpg)
- #VISUAL STUDIO 2005 PROFESSIONAL EDITION INSTALL#
- #VISUAL STUDIO 2005 PROFESSIONAL EDITION CODE#
- #VISUAL STUDIO 2005 PROFESSIONAL EDITION WINDOWS#
It would be nicer if developed natively for each system, although I understand the downfalls of that.Īnd as far as the standards thing goes, I'm not convinced that Visual Studio compilers deviate enough to affect you (if at all). NetBeans is beginning to grow on me for Java development, but it runs horribly in Windows. Dev-C++, if I remember correctly, was even less impressive. Sure it's a nice IDE, but it doesn't compare to Visual Studio. I've tried Code::Blocks and I wasn't overly impressed.
#VISUAL STUDIO 2005 PROFESSIONAL EDITION INSTALL#
Anybody know of a good IDE that an intermediary can install and dive into without years of experience? Granted, I'm a rather young programmer, but I haven't had very good luck with finding a rich IDE in Linux for C/C++. I haven't seen an environment nearly as efficient/convenient/beautiful as Visual Studio. If Linux was as friendly was it is powerful, or even if somebody developed a distro/layer to make it so, Microsoft wouldn't monopolize the OSs of common users like it does today there would be another (better) option.
![visual studio 2005 professional edition visual studio 2005 professional edition](https://static.softwarekeep.com/catalog/product/v/i/visualstud2005std_2.png)
![visual studio 2005 professional edition visual studio 2005 professional edition](https://images.slideplayer.com/18/6145773/slides/slide_6.jpg)
#VISUAL STUDIO 2005 PROFESSIONAL EDITION WINDOWS#
I'm still rather new to Linux, and although it's very powerful, the GUI interface(s) are still lacking compared to some Windows things, and in terms of user-friendliness you can't argue that Linux is more of a developer's system and not really meant for general users. And a lot of M$ products are very nice to use compared to the alternatives. They put a price on their products they believe to be fair and they don't hold a gun to anybody's head to purchase them. I don't think it's a fair thing to dislike Microsoft because they are successful. And i guess no one here likes to debug several hours straight?
#VISUAL STUDIO 2005 PROFESSIONAL EDITION CODE#
Which leaks would have been found out by not even compiling the code under a c++ standard compliant compiler. Which as a side-effect, will give you alot less time in the debugger, because if things go wrong in a compiler that does not follow the standard, you can get very nasty leaks in one way or another. Which aint good, so thats why its good using a C++ compiler that tries to follow the standard as good as possible. It's easy to write "illegal" code, which means that if you go to a stricter compiler that do follow the standard, it means that the code might not even compile or else it might compile with loads of warnings. And you know why it not following the standard is really ugly and error prone, its because if it does not try to follow the standard well. Oh and also forgot, i got no example of how it has screwed me of, because i haven't used it due to it not following the standard. So i don't have to switch OS when its time to program, if i was just playing a game before it. Only reason i actually got windows even installed, is due to gaming, since not many companies support Linux natively.Īnd since i do, i also want a good IDE for both linux & windows to program in. The only reason i wanted to use their IDE is because it really is a good product, even if i dislike everything they stand for. But gcc is a very widely used compiler for C++ and is the one and only for me, that doesn't cost a cent, its even used very widely professionally.Īlso, i'm not a fan of Microsoft themselves, i don't like their principles and way of bussines.
![visual studio 2005 professional edition visual studio 2005 professional edition](http://www.everything-oracle.com/images/ebswin02.png)
Right off the bat, i got no example, but it does not follow the standard i know that, not that any compiler follows the standard up-to-date.